About MPN > Campaign Finance | Stimulus | Governor | Legislature | Economy | Environment | Best of MPN
Sunday, January 31, 2010
CNN highlights Tuscumbia bridge project in Missouri
CNN's report questions the jobs estimates touted by Missouri Dept. of Transportation Director Pete Rahn, who claimed hundreds of indirect jobs would be created as a result of the project.
In fact, those jobs may have been created but there is no direct evidence to substantiate their creation. CNN's investigative team, however, focuses only on the local Tuscumbia economy. It's unlikely that the town would have felt much of an impact since many of the materials would have come from specialty plants throughout the state.
According to recipient reports released by the White House over the weekend, the Tuscumbia bridge -- one of four transportation projects in Tuscumbia -- created 14 jobs in the fourth quarter of last year, including "skilled construction laborers, general laborers, equipment operators, carpenters, iron workers and cement masons".
The project received an $8.2 million allocation and has spent $5.2 million of that so far. It's status is listed as more than 50 percent complete, but according to CNN it's not quite complete yet one month into the first quarter of 2010.
The question CNN raises is was this a worthwhile use of taxpayer funds? We won't answer the question directly, but here is something to contemplate that was omitted from the CNN report: in the absence of the Tuscumbia bridge, locals would have to travel 20 to 30 miles to the next closest bridges. Assuming they would be trying to get from one side to the other of the river, the round trip could be up to 60 miles. Such a change in transportation costs could have, in the absence of the bridge, decimated the remaining local economy.
Just a thought to keep in mind as you watch the CNN report here.
MPNblog.com readership continues growth; BlogNet rankings return with MPN in top 10
The readership here at MPNblog.com continues to increase since our re-launch in Oct. 2009. Compared to the heyday in 2008, however, readership still remains well below historic peaks.
Unique visits are up over 40 percent in Jan. 2010 from Dec. 2009, but remained 60 percent below peak readership from the summer of 2008.
The BlogNet rankings consider visitors, comments, and references from other websites.
House District 21: Republican forms committee to challenge Schultz for open seat
In mid-Jan., Mike Becker filed paperwork with the Missouri Ethics Commission to begin raising funds for the campaign. Becker, a Republican, currently serves as a member of the Boone County Fire Protection District's board of directors.
But Becker will have a lot of ground to make up in order to maintain Republican control of this open seat. That's because Schultz's campaign has already raised nearly $35,000 this election cycle.
Term-limited Rep. Steve Hobbs (R) faced Schultz in 2008, and with the advantage of incumbency, defeated Schultz by a 12 point margin. But with the name recognition Schultz picked up in 2008, in combination with the shifting demographics of the district, this district could potentially flip in favor of Democrats in 2010.
The only indicator to go on so far for this race is campaign finances, which in general show broad support for Schultz to date. About 57 percent of Schultz's fundraising in 2009 was from individuals and businesses, almost all within Missouri. MPN identified 186 of the 235 itemized non-political committee contributions were from the Central Missouri region.
At the end of 2009, Schultz reported raising $34,803 with $1,431 in debt. Her campaign also reported $29,410 cash-on-hand.
Related Links:
Schultz Campaign Finance Reports | Schultz campaign website
Becker Campaign Finance Reports
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Ethics Commission doles out $218,000 in fines for violations
The Missouri Ethics Commission may have finally grown teeth and shown it is willing to impose hefty penalties on political committees that fail to comply with public disclosure laws.
At a meeting on Jan. 26 the Ethics Commission imposed a total of $218,000 in penalties on three political committees.
In the first set of complaints, the Ethics Commission voted to impose a $168,000 fine against the Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection District Improvement Committee and its treasurer, Linda Love Tolbert. In addition to the fine, the Ethics Commission will require the Committee to "file all campaign finance disclosure reports which are due by the committee, including all reports which are the subject of this complaint and the January 2010 Quarterly Report".
On a second complaint, the Ethics Commission found violations of 10 separate provisions of Missouri statute and ordered Northeast Firefighters PAC and treasurer Kirk McPike pay a fine of $13,000 and file disclosure reports not yet turned in. It's possible this committee could pay as little as $1,300 if the reports are filed within 90 days.
In a third complaint, against Democrat April Harris, the Ethics Commission found probably cause of violations and ordered Harris' committee to pay $35,670 in fines for failure to file two quarterly reports, among other reasons.
Related Links:
MEC Minutes from Jan. 26, 2010
Skelton on pace for record fundraising in 2010 election cycle
Skelton's year-end campaign finance report filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) reported contributions of $491,825 during the most recent quarter, for a total of 1,102,887 during the election cycle to date.
That total, with 10 months to go until the election, is just $20,000 below the total Skelton reported in the 2008 election cycle -- his best fundraising period since serving in Congress.
Major contributors of note to Skelton during the most recent period include the Missouri Farm Bureau, American Soybean Association, Dairy Farmers of America, all members of Boeing's executive leadership (Skelton is the Chairman of the House Armed Services committee), and 20 Missouri small business owners.
To date, Skelton has received only nominal support from Democratic Party committees, amounting to a whopping $703.
At the end of the reporting period, Skelton's campaign had $966,727 cash-on-hand.
Note that MPNblog.com will have a comparative analysis as the Republican challengers' reports are filed this weekend with the FEC.
Related Links:
Skelton 4Q-2009 Campaign Finance Report (PDF)
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Hartzler denounces entire Obama State of the Union address
There may have been portions of President Obama's State of the Union address to Congress that every American could agree on. For instance, Obama acknowledged the bank bailout wasn't very popular.
"And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal," Obama said.
We don't know of anyone that disagrees outside the financial sector.
But the agreements aren't what Congressional challengers choose to focus on, and that is abundantly clear in the press release issued by a potential challenger to Rep. Ike Skelton.
Below is a fusion of comments from candidate Vicky Hartzler, who must still emerge victorious from a primary before challenging Skelton, and the President's speech:
Hartzler: The job-killing cap-and-trade legislation would only further destroy small businesses and impose one of the largest across-the-board tax increases in our nation’s history. Mr. Skelton was one of four deciding votes to pass the bill in the House. If honored to cast the vote for Missouri’s Fourth District, I will oppose this radical and destructive power grab in any form.
The President: "...it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America. I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. This year, I am eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy; and I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future - because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation."
MPN Editor: Technically every vote is a "deciding vote", that's the notion of voting.
Hartzler: President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Ike Skelton clearly don’t understand that the way to create jobs is not to redistribute wealth from one class of taxpayers to another. Refusing to cut taxes on business owners who make over $250,000 is a policy representative of this administration’s flawed approach to governance and economics.
The President: "As we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed.
"That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65% cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.
"Let me repeat: we cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95% of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas, and food, and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.
"...The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. That's right - the Recovery Act, also known as the Stimulus Bill. Economists on the left and the right say that this bill has helped saved jobs and avert disaster. But you don't have to take their word for it."
Related Links:
View the full text of the State of the Union here
Official Republican Response here
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Skelton Weekly Column: Washington Must Focus on the Needs of Everyday Americans
From Congressman Ike Skelton (D):
Over the past six months, Washington has ignored many everyday problems in order to rush too much change. Instead of focusing on the economic problems crippling many American families and paying closer attention to the war against terrorists, Washington has spent valuable time wrestling with health reforms that many believe should not be the top priority. In response, many Americans have become increasingly frustrated. Every day, I hear from people who are concerned and even frightened. They are concerned about the state of the economy, about the security of our nation, and about the uncertainties of recent reform proposals.
This is not news to me, and I share much of their sentiment. I work hard to stay in touch with those of the Fourth Congressional District, and I have heard many passionate arguments against drastic reform from Missourians over the past several months. That is why I voted against the health insurance reform bill in November and have worked strenuously to bolster the small businesses and agricultural markets that drive Missouri’s economy. I have also continued to guide our renewed effort in Afghanistan while strengthening our veteran support programs here in the U.S.
As I have said from the beginning of this debate, Congress should tackle health insurance reform one issue at a time, such as mandating the portability of insurance across state lines or outlawing the consideration of preexisting conditions. Common-sense reforms, such as these, should be approached on a bipartisan basis.
Many years ago, President Roosevelt identified, in simple terms, the bedrock principles that define our nation. Calling them the “Four Freedoms,” Roosevelt deftly enumerated every American’s right to the freedom of speech, the freedom of religious choice, the freedom from want, and the freedom from fear.
The freedom from fear. It is this right, this integral American freedom, that many Missourians feel is currently at stake. As an elected official, it is my duty to defend that freedom for the people of the Fourth District, and I do my best to do so. Many times, that means strengthening our military and our global alliances. Other times, that means providing for programs that strengthen our domestic society and improve America from within. That also means voting against legislation that may not help our country.
Related Links:
U.S. Rep. Ike Skelton's Official Website
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Senate District 24: Total fundraising for open seat tops $875,000
The candidates include three Democrats and two Republicans vying to replace term-limited State Sen. Joan Bray (D), who represents part of St. Louis county.
Former Lt. Gov. candidate Sam Page (D) currently leads candidates from both parties with total contributions received and cash-on-hand. Page's total receipts, in fact, are more than twice his two primary challengers combined.
Here's a look at each candidate's fundraising report from the fourth quarter of 2009:
Democratic Candidate Fundraising Reports:
Sam Page (D) -- At present, Page is well positioned to dominate the Democratic primary field. Page reported receipts during the most recent fundraising period of $97,508, bringing his total fundraising for the election to $443,140. A small fraction of his total receipts came from political committees (7%) and a nearly equal share was not itemized (7%) .
Of the itemized receipts from businesses and individuals (86%), three-quarters came from donors in Missouri (some of that total included 3 in-kind contributions of $1,125 from Page). While Page reported contributions from all 7 regions of the state, an indication Page continues to tap into his support from the 2008 Lt. Gov. campaign, his strongest fundraising area was the St. Louis region which accounted for 66 percent of his in-state total.
Page's largest contribution of $5,000 was from Simmons, Browder, Giarnaris, Angelides & Barnerd LLC in Alton, Illinois. The same firm donated just shy of $40,000 to other campaigns during the last quarter.
Page reported $204,186 in disbursements during the election cycle to date, not including $1,350 in contributions to other political committees. At the end of the period Page's committee had $230,855 cash-on-hand.
Barbara Fraser (D) -- Fraser reported receipts well behind Page, totaling $30,528 in the last quarter and $137,573 total for this election cycle. A small fraction of her total was from political committees (2%) and 35 percent was not itemized, which typically means it came from fundraising events where individuals contributed less than $100 each. Of Fraser's total receipts during the last quarter, 63 percent of the itemized were from businesses and individuals, almost exclusively in the St. Louis region.
Fraser reported just $34,347 in disbursements during the election cycle so far, slightly more than Corcoran but significantly less than Page. At the end of the period, Fraser reported $105,227 cash-on-hand.
Michael Corcoran (D) -- Rep. Corcoran's fundraising is trailing both other challengers in the Democratic primary. In the most recent quarter, 86 percent of Corcoran's total contributions came from political committees (most of which were mis-coded in Corcoran's campaign finance report). Most of that total -- $10,000 -- came from the Sprinkler Fitters Local 268 in St. Louis.
Just 14 percent of his total fundraising came from businesses and individuals, and about half of that came from donors outside the state of Missouri. During the quarter, Corcoran raised less than $1,000 from businesses and individuals in the St. Louis Region.
So far this election cycle Corcoran has spent $26,801 and contributed $150 to other campaigns. At the end of 2009, Corcoran's committee reported $27,324 cash-on-hand.
Republican Candidate Fundraising Reports:
John Lamping (R) -- The cousin of former St. Louis Cardinals president Mark Lamping, is off to a good start on fundraising after two strong quarters. Lamping reported raising $131,496 during the last quarter, about $50,000 more than Page, the fundraising leader in the Democratic primary. Lamping's total receipts so far this election cycle amount to $206,500, inclusive of a $25,000 contribution from Lamping, and in addition to a $75,000 personal loan.
The single largest contribution for Lamping came from venture capitalists Tom and Kristen Roberts from Wellesley, Massachusetts, who donated $25,000.
During the quarter, about 18 percent of Lamping's reciepts came from political committees, including 7 sitting Republican state senators. 82 percent of Lamping's donations came from businesses and individuals, 58 percent of which were actually in the state of Missouri. That amount, of in-state fundraising that is, was greater than any other candidate from either party in the Senate District 24 contest. More importantly, Lamping's in-state contributions, with the exception of $100, are exclusively from the St. Louis region, indicative of broad support in the district where voters will actually be casting ballots on this position.
Dean Plocher (R) -- Plocher, a newcomer to elected politics, is off to a slow start on fundraising, pulling in just $27,690 during the most recent fundraising quarter and $35,434 so far this election cycle. Unlike all of the other candidates for this district, Plocher did not receive a dime from other political committees which means all of his support is from individuals and businesses, not other elected officials (yet). Plocher reported most of his receipts from in-state donors (92%), all of which were from the St. Louis Region.
Plocher received two contributions greater than $5,000 in the most recent quarter, from Darrell Plocher and Vince Smugala of St. Louis.
At the end of the fundraising period, Plocher reported $8,453 in disbursements and maintained $24,416 cash-on-hand.
Related Links:
Corcoran Campaign Finance Reports
Page Campaign Finance Reports | Page campaign website
Fraser Campaign Finance Reports | Fraser campaign website
Plocher Campaign Finance Reports | Plocher campaign website
Lamping campaign finance reports | Lamping campaign website
Monday, January 25, 2010
Party committees contribute half million to candidates so far in election cycle
MPN analyzed finance reports from all 341 active political party campaign finance committees on record with the Missouri Ethics Commission. MPN's analysis identified 33 committees contributing $461,710 to candidates so far this election cycle, through the 4th quarter of 2009. Democrats controlled 16 of those committees and contributed $233,822. That was only slightly more than the $227,888 contributed from 14 Republican committees.
A large number of the once active district committees seem to largely be dormant now. MPN's analysis identified 216 party committees that filed limited activity statements with the Ethics Commission for the most recent fundraising period. These statements are used for committees that receive and expend less than $500 (RsMO 130-046).
Political party committees collectively received $3.1 million over the past year, the majority of which ($2 million) went to the main committees for the Democratic and Republican Parties, which also accounted for about $338,000 of the total candidate contributions cited above.
Of the 341 active party committees, 29 have not yet filed reports with the Ethics Commission. Those reports were due more than a week ago, on Jan. 15.
The remaining committees reported just over $1 million cash-on-hand as of the end of 2009.
Related Links:
MPN Analysis: Party Committee Receipts, Expenditures, Contributions, and Cash-on-Hand for election cycle, as of 4Q-2009
Sunday, January 24, 2010
State senators file constitutional amendment to protect state sovereignty
Legislation filed by State Sens. Jack Goodman (R) and Eric Schmitt (R) would protect state sovereignty, according to the sponsors.
The constitutional amendment, which would require approval of Missouri voters if it proceeds through the General Assembly, would allow initiative petitions for the Attorney General to challenge federal legislation thought to violate the 10th amendment of the U.S. Constitution:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
“There must be a mechanism set in place to protect the people when government exceeds its legitimate powers,” Sen. Goodman said in a press release. “The federal government has proven itself to have no restraint when it comes to exceeding its constitutional authority. Our founders deliberately established a system with most governing taking place at levels of government close to the voters. We must take steps to safeguard these protections for the people of Missouri.”
Goodman, the Assistant Republican Floor Leader, represents portions of Barry, Lawrence, McDonald, Ozark, Stone and Taney counties. Schmitt represents part of St. Louis county.
Related Links:
SJR 34 (2010)
Only one campaign committee failed to file quarterly campaign finance report for 4Q-2009
Of the 17 active campaign committees registered with the Missouri Ethics Commission, only one failed to file required financial disclosure paperwork for the last fundraising quarter -- Committee for Our Kids and Our Future.
The campaign committee was formed to support a ballot initiative for Ralls County R-II school district that was voted on in the Nov. 3, 2009 election.
Voters were asked to determine if $1.4 million in bonds should be issued for a tornado-safe building at the Mark Twain Junior-Senior High School:
Shall the Ralls County R-II School District issue its general obligation
bonds in the amount of $1,436,000 for the purpose of constructing, improving, furnishing and equipping multiple school facilities, including a tornado-safe multipurpose building and roof repairs, resulting in no estimated tax increase to the debt service property tax levy?
If this question is approved, the District’s debt service tax levy is estimated
to remain unchanged at the current levy of $0.71 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation.
Voters approved the measure by a vote of 551-323, well in excess of the five-sevenths majority needed for approval.
Although the election is over, the committee is still listed as active and thus requires appropriate paperwork to be filed with the Ethics Commission.
The campaign committee lists Ranae Ogle, an English teacher for the school district, as its treasurer.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Union membership continues to plunge in Missouri
In 2009, 234,000 Missouri workers were members of unions, 9.4 percent of the state's workforce. Membership is down over 107,000 since the beginning of the decade.
Just 5 years earlier, in 2004, Missouri's union membership was roughly equal to the national average. Today though, the differential in membership is an astounding 2.9 percentage points.
Union membership in Missouri reached a peak of 15.5 percent in 1989 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics and has been declining ever since.
Nationally in 2009, for the first time ever, BLS estimates the majority of union members are actually government workers and not private-sector employees. For government workers, union membership grew from 36.8 percent in 2008 to 37.4 percent in 2009 (7.9 million workers). Private sector membership, however, just 7.2 percent of workers were unionized in 2009 (7.4 million workers), down from 7.6 percent one year earlier.
BLS also estimated that unionized workers did in fact have higher earnings on average than their un-unionized counterparts. Union members' earnings were estimated to be about $200 more a week.
Political Implications
Waning union membership has huge political implications for Missouri following a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this week that overturned limits on corporate and union campaign contributions. Since unions generally favor Democrats and are often at odds with big business, there is an implication that declining union membership will adversely impact Democrats while disproportionately benefiting state Republicans.
In 2008, MPN penned a story noting that waning union membership also means union endorsements hold less weight, since there are fewer members to support the endorsed candidate. That seems more true now than ever.
As we noted then and will reiterate now, political scientists never consistently agreed on whether unions translated into favorable votes from members of the union since members are not bound to vote for a particular candidate - or even party - based on a union's endorsement.
Within Missouri Democratic primaries, unions will likely continue to play an important role nonetheless, especially as major financial backers. The uncertainty is how much that influence translates to actual votes in a general election.
Related Links:
BLS Union Data
Friday, January 22, 2010
Fact Check: Kinder's comments on size of governor's staff -- false
In his response to the State of the State address Wed. night, Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder (R) took jabs at Gov. Jay Nixon (D) for increasing the size of his staff last year.
"Here are the facts: the governor has the largest and highest paid personal staff of any Missouri governor… in history."Nixon's office doesn't deny the expansion of staff or payroll, but there's an issue with Kinder's statement that renders the "facts" he presented slightly less than factual.
Current data doesn't substantiate Kinder's claim.
In 2009, the Office of the Governor (excluding elected officials) had a total payroll of $1.75 million. Two years earlier, under the administration of former Gov. Matt Blunt (R), the same office had a total payroll of $1.76. Adjust Blunt's payroll for inflation to make it equivalent to Nixon's payroll, and Blunt's team had a payroll about $70,000 higher.
In looking solely at state appropriations, historically, the governor's office budget is still less than in FY 2003 when total appropriated expenses amounted to $2.2 million. It's also worth noting that the employee ceiling (a.k.a. FTE ceiling) in the appropriations bills was only 39 in FY 2010, 4 less than in FY 2003.
So is this the largest staff with the greatest payroll in history. It doesn't seem to be so. MPN is labeling this claim false.
Thursday, January 21, 2010
In ethics, not all legislation is equal
"It's time we gave the people of Missouri a state government that's as honest and straight-shooting as they are," Nixon said in the speech. Nixon also outlined four areas that he says need reform:
- "Stop the sneaky, back-door donations from committee-to-committee.
- "Ban one officeholder from working as a political consultant for another officeholder.
- "Shut the revolving door between the legislature and lobbyists, for good.
- "And most importantly, set strict limits on campaign contributions. Missouri voters overwhelmingly mandated them. As Attorney General, I fought for them. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld them. It's just the right thing to do."
The two proposals addressed in the legislature today were presented in the Special Committee on Government Oversight and Ethics Reform, a new committee created by Speaker Ron Richard (R) this year to address the various proposals.
The first piece of legislation was HB 1332 from Democratic Floor Leader Paul LeVota. The legislation calls for a reinstatement of contribution caps removed in the final hours of the 2008 legislative session.
"Citizens must have trust in their elected officials and ending any type of perception that our government is for sale in the State Capitol must be our top priority this session," LeVota said during the hearing. "I think the big issue that erodes trust in our government is the amount of money in the system."
The second bill of the day, sponsored by Rep. Steve Tilley (R), had no limit on contributions but imposed a series of other bans and reforms including new financial disclosure requirements.
The Committee still has a number of other proposals it has not yet considered that include some provisions not included in LeVota's and Tilley's bills. Full details of all current ethics proposals from MPN's brief review of the bills can be found here.
Related Links:
MPN comparison of current ethics legislation
Audio of hearing via MissouriNet
Full Text of Lt. Gov.'s Response to State of the State Address
The full text (all 1,629 words) of Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder's response to the second State of the State address from Gov. Jay Nixon:
Thank you, and good evening.
It’s an honor to speak to you tonight, and with the many Missourians watching this broadcast at home.
These are tough times, and I know you’re here tonight and watching at home because you want honest answers about the future of our state.
12 months ago, Governor Nixon announced that hundreds of millions of dollars of so-called “stimulus” funds were heading to Missouri. And, despite our warnings, he irresponsibly chose to balance his budget with that money.
Here we are, one year later. And due to the governor’s failure to act swiftly to address the budget crisis, we now face an even bigger shortfall.
As for those federal stimulus dollars: the Governor has already spent over 80% of that money.
You see, we were promised that this money would help put people back to work. But today our state is facing a nearly 10% unemployment rate; the highest rate in over a quarter of a century. Just days ago we found out that Missouri lost another twenty-six hundred jobs in December, adding to the thousands of Missourians who have lost their jobs since Governor Nixon took office.
Tonight, just like Washington politicians, Governor Nixon called for several new government programs. But each of these new programs will cost money—money that we do not have.
Now is not the time for ideas to grow the size of government. Our most important goal should be putting people back to work – period.
While Governor Nixon made a promise tonight to not raise taxes, just weeks ago HIS tax commission voted to raise taxes on Missouri farmers by almost 29-percent. This is a devastating blow to our agricultural producers after one of the worst farm income years since 1945.
In the coming days, Missouri Republicans will move to stop this tax hike from Governor Nixon.
Tonight, Republicans in Missouri will make this promise: we WILL NOT raise your taxes.
Instead, we will tighten our belts and find ways to stretch every dollar, just like countless Missouri families do everyday. Last year, the governor refused to consult with us, borrowed money from the state’s rainy day fund, shuffled money in closed door meetings and ‘cooked the books’ with Wall Street-style accounting.
There has been no transparency in the budget process—the Governor has kept Missourians in the dark. And when lawmakers passed a bill to make the governor’s budget accessible to you online, the governor vetoed that bill.
I believe all of us deserve to know how our tax dollars are being spent. You expect your government to live within its means. That is a promise you have from your Republican leaders. It’s a pledge the governor has refused to live up to.
Many of you had to wait until late summer to receive your income tax refunds.
Last year, Governor Nixon mismanaged Missouri’s budget and literally ran our state into a deficit. Then after depleting the state’s checking account, he used your income tax refunds to fill those budgetary holes
They claimed it was because of delays in processing. But we later found out we were once again being misled. Your tax returns were not delayed because of “processing issues,” but rather due to Governor Nixon’s huge budget shortfalls.
I, for one, DO NOT believe it is acceptable for the governor to sit on the money you are lawfully owed just so he can pay bills.
Republicans know that is YOUR money.
So, in the coming days, Republican lawmakers in the House and Senate will file a joint resolution telling Governor Nixon that we expect him to return your money to you ON TIME.
Because how we handle taxpayer money in difficult times says a lot about our values.
Over the past year, Governor Nixon has slashed funding for education. He has reduced money from your local school’s transportation budget. And he has cut funding for scholarships for Missouri students. But he has not made the same sacrifices he is demanding from others.
I don’t believe that you can effectively propose to overhaul government, transform budgets and reform ethics when you aren’t willing to take those steps on your own.
Here are the facts: the governor has the largest and highest paid personal staff of any Missouri governor… in history.
I was shocked to learn that while we offered to cut our office budget, the governor actually asked for more funding. That, to me and thousands of unemployed Missourians, is unacceptable.
You see, on Governor Nixon’s watch, nearly 62,000 Missourians have seen their jobs disappear. That’s nearly 170 Missourians losing jobs each day.
Last year, when the unemployment rate was much lower, the governor made the mistake of relying on a federal bailout. He dismissed concerns about skyrocketing debt and actually said, and I quote, “If there’s debt, Missouri kids and grandkids will pay that debt off.” A truly shocking statement.
Our burden should NOT be passed on to future generations.
Instead, we must help Missouri’s small businesses create new, innovative jobs. That is the only way our state will remain competitive in an ever evolving global market.
Right now, leaders in St. Louis are moving forward with the global trade initiative and the Midwest China Hub Commission. These projects are critical to ignite job creation, and yet to this day, Governor Nixon is dragging his feet on this project. I am hopeful that in the coming months, he will join us in supporting this significant investment opportunity.
A bright economic future depends on how successful we are at preparing Missouri students for the jobs of tomorrow. That means providing guaranteed funding for our K-12 classrooms and ensuring that our state colleges provide the most innovative learning environments imaginable.
Tonight, the governor also talked about reforming the ethics of political culture here in Jefferson City. Republicans support a TRUE ethical review in the Missouri statehouse… but we must start from the top down.
In the past year, lawmakers have credibly charged Governor Nixon’s staff with offering them jobs for their votes. The governor has rewarded top donors with the state’s most lucrative fee offices and withheld vital health and safety information from the public. Right now, a Senate Committee is reviewing the actions of Governor Nixon’s Department of Natural Resources. It’s a sad day when journalists have to ask the governor, “Who knew what, and when.”
Most importantly tonight, I want you to know that Republicans are standing with you.
We understand times are tough, and that means we will oppose anything that threatens to cost you more money.
In a corrupt process, President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are writing a healthcare bill that will force hundreds of millions in new state spending and hand Missouri taxpayers the bill.
To be clear: that is money we DO NOT have.
Democrats in Washington intend to pay for their healthcare experiment by shifting massive costs to each state. Their bill includes billions of dollars in job-killing new taxes on businesses and individuals—but up to this point Governor Nixon has refused to speak out on the plan.
While governors from both parties across America are speaking out on this violation of state’s sovereignty, OUR governor remains silent.
Governor Phil Bredesen, a Democrat from Tennessee has said this healthcare bill is, “…the mother of all unfunded mandates…”
And California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who supported this bill in its early form, has now come out against the legislation after calculating the true cost on the residents of his state.
He may have said it best:
What began as a "noble" health reform effort has become a "trough of special bribes, deals, and loopholes."
By remaining silent, Governor Nixon is aiding and abetting the Washington Democrats agenda—and THAT is unacceptable. But if the governor will not speak up, we will.
Barely 24-hours ago, the Republican-led House of Representatives passed a resolution demanding that Democrats in Congress stop their dangerous experiment with our health care system.
I sent a letter to Governor Nixon a few weeks ago and have yet to hear back, so tonight on LIVE TV, I’ll pose my question once again: “Governor Nixon, Missourians deserve to know. Will you join us in opposition to this federal health care disaster?”
You see, Missouri Republicans take healthcare very seriously.
We have continued to fund health clinics around the state so that children of the most low-income families in Missouri can be seen by a doctor for free. The list of these clinics can be found online at; www.MoKidsCovered.com that Web site again is, www.MoKidsCovered.com.
Right now, we are also taking the first steps in addressing medical coverage for thousands of families across our state that have children with Autism. This bill continues the dialogue, and recognizes the importance for lawmakers to work together in finding a way to expand healthcare coverage for families dealing with Autism.
In closing, Republicans want you to know that we are standing with YOU.
While some elected officials believe that you are lucky to have them in office, we are humbled and honored to serve the citizens of this great state. We take that creed seriously.
While we face challenges and uncertainty, I know we Missourians are a determined people, and together we will rise to meet any challenge.
You know the value of hard work and strong values. For decades we have defended those values and tonight I promise you, our commitment is renewed with sincere vigor.
We are proud to call Missouri home. And together, we will work to build a future that is better place for our families, our children and grandchildren because of the tough decisions we make here today.
Thank you for listening tonight.
May God bless you, and may God continue to bless the Great State of Missouri.
Full Text of Gov. Jay Nixon's 2010 State of the State Address
The full text (all 5,492 words) of Gov. Jay Nixon's second State of the State address:
STATE OF THE STATE ADDRESS
Gov. Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon
Jan. 20, 2010
Thank you, Speaker Richard, President Pro-Tem Shields, Leaders Callahan and LeVota, Judges of the Missouri Supreme Court, Lieutenant Governor Kinder, state officials, members of the General Assembly and members of my cabinet.
Welcome honored guests and my fellow Missourians.
It's a privilege to be here this evening. I am blessed to have with me Missouri's First Lady, my wife Georganne, and our two sons, Jeremiah and Will.
One year ago, as we gathered in this very room, a massive ice storm struck southern Missouri.
Miles of power lines went down, plunging tens of thousands of people into bitter cold and darkness.
I'll never forget what I saw in the days and weeks that followed. Everywhere I went, people of every color and creed were joining hands to help their neighbors.
They brought blankets and home-cooked meals to Kennett.
They came with chainsaws and pickup trucks to Thayer.
They turned school gyms and church basements into havens of warmth and safety in Doniphan, Naylor and Poplar Bluff.
They didn't ask how anybody voted. They didn't care who was rich or poor.
They came together in a crisis, because that's what the people of Missouri do.
That's a powerful lesson for us here tonight: The worst of times brings out the best in us.
And when the people of Missouri join hands and work together we can accomplish anything.
That makes me proud of our state, proud to be a Missourian and proud to be your Governor.
Tonight, our thoughts and prayers go out to the people of Haiti, who are suffering in the tragic aftermath of the massive earthquake on January 12. There are many ways Missourians can help. I encourage you to go to our Web site, MO.gov, and learn more about what you can do.
From the moment I took the oath of office, I have focused my energy on one thing: turning this economy around.
Our mission is clear:
We must keep the jobs we have, and create thousands more.
We must build a granite foundation for Missouri's future growth.
And we must balance the budget without raising taxes.
Tonight, I will review some of the hard-won accomplishments of the year behind us... address the challenges ahead of us ... highlight the opportunities we must seize now to spur job growth ... and lay out my long-term strategy to create a vibrant future for our state.
But before I get to the heart of my economic message, I'd like to recognize the brave Missourians, in all branches of our military, who have left their families in our care, to fight terror around the world.
With us tonight is Specialist Michael Thomas, a Citizen-Soldier with the Missouri National Guard. Specialist Thomas was serving with the Missouri National Guard's Agri-Business Development Team II in Afghanistan when his convoy was hit by a suicide bomber in March 2009. As the gunner on his vehicle, Specialist Thomas sustained a direct hit from the blast. For his sacrifice, he was awarded the Purple Heart.
Specialist Thomas, as Commander in Chief of the Missouri National Guard, I commend you for your service to our country. You represent every man and woman who has ever fought for our freedom and liberty... in every time... and on every field of battle.
Specialist Thomas, on their behalf, please stand and accept the gratitude of your state.
Every action we took in 2009, and every action we will take in 2010, is set against the backdrop of global forces that constrain our nation's economy. That is the nature of the complex world we live in.
But it will not determine Missouri's destiny.
We will.
Our most pressing economic challenges - creating jobs, seizing opportunities for growth, and balancing the budget - are too important to be sidetracked by partisan bickering. That would betray the trust put in us by the people.
We also need to take the long view, and be wise stewards of the blessings that make Missouri so special: our families, our communities, and our God-given natural resources.
In everything we do this year, we must put our differences aside - and put Missouri first.
I'm an optimist by nature, and nothing I have seen this year has diminished my optimism.
My vision of the future is colored by my abiding faith in the resourcefulness and determination of the people of Missouri.
I want the little girl who someday cracks the code of cancer to be a product of Missouri schools.
I want the little boy who invents clean fuel to heat our homes and power our cars to be a native son.
And I want thousands of Missourians working in high-tech jobs, using technology we can only dream of today.
That's the future I see for Missouri.
And to reach it, I want Missouri to be first in job creation.
First in education.
First in innovation.
First in quality of life.
And first in leading this nation to recovery.
Everywhere I've traveled in the last 12 months, from K.C. to Cape, I've heard the same refrain from businesses large and small: "Give us the tools, help us train the workers, and we'll do the rest."
Last year, our bi-partisan jobs bill helped put more of these tools in place.
We ramped up financial incentives for businesses that offered good jobs and health insurance. And we focused state resources on targeted, fast-track training programs to prepare a workforce ready to step into those jobs.
Let me give you a few examples of our success.
Express Scripts in St. Louis, used Missouri BUILD incentives to expand here, rather than Pennsylvania. Now it's building a huge, automated facility for filling medical prescriptions. And it will create nearly 300 jobs paying an average wage of more than $40,000 a year.
McLane, a grocery distribution company owned by Warren Buffett, used state incentives to build a large new facility in Republic that will create 250 full-time jobs with good wages. If Warren Buffett is bullish on Missouri, it's good for all of us.
Smith Electric Vehicles makes all-electric, zero-emission trucks. It's building a new plant in Kansas City using our Quality Jobs incentives. That plant will create 200 jobs, and pump millions of dollars into the local economy.
And the list goes on.
While we were helping large employers, we didn't forget about the small businesses that are a mainstay of Missouri's economy.
We eliminated the franchise tax for 16,000 small businesses like Kelley's Furniture in Kirksville, so they could expand and add jobs.
We also started a small business loan program. One of those loans went to Beth Daniels, who owns a company in Eureka that makes educational games. Last year, Beth was worried she wouldn't have enough games in stock to fill holiday orders. So she used her loan to build up inventory and hire another employee. Please welcome one of the Show-Me State's budding entrepreneurs, Beth Daniels.
Job-creation initiatives only succeed if there are trained workers ready to step into those jobs. So we upped our investment in training people.
Last fall, we began implementing our Caring for Missourians initiative to train more Missourians for careers in high-demand health care fields - including nursing and dentistry, optometry and medical technology. Over the next two years, we'll be enrolling at least 1,300 additional students in these programs at our two- and four-year colleges, and preparing these students to meet our state's critical health care needs.
We also put more money into accelerated programs at community colleges to help dislocated workers retrain and get back into the job market - fast.
It's clear that our key business incentives and workforce investments are bearing fruit. But much more needs to be done. That's why my top legislative priority this year is my 2010 Jobs Plan.
It contains three key components.
First, we must leverage every tool and tactic to help loyal Missouri businesses thrive.
Second, we must outrun and outfox our rivals to recruit new high-tech companies to Missouri.
And third, we must train a workforce that's ready-to-roll, and second-to-none.
The Missouri First initiative is my loyalty program for businesses that are already here. They'll go to the head of the line for financial incentives to help expand plants or payrolls.
We'll give an extra bump to businesses that have been in Missouri longer than five years. After all, these are the companies who have given generations of Missourians steady paychecks. They're also the folks who paid the taxes that built our roads, our schools and our parks.
Given Missouri's need to create jobs quickly, helping loyal businesses accelerate their growth just may be the smartest investment we can make - with the fastest return.
As your Governor, I'll continue to push hard to recruit new businesses to Missouri. And make no mistake: I've got a competitive streak.
That brings me to the second part of my jobs plan, the Missouri Science and Innovation Reinvestment Act: MOSIRA.
Missouri is already home to 1,000 biological science companies. This is an area where we can add muscle to existing strength.
MOSIRA will reinvest a small part of the taxes paid by existing bio-tech firms in Missouri, to recruit new ones. It will create a stable pool of funds to increase access to capital. And it will help turn scientific breakthroughs into commercial successes.
We want our bio-tech companies to grow because that creates more jobs. But just as important are the corollaries of that growth: a culture of excellence and collaboration, a forum where brilliant minds find kindred spirits, a hotbed of ideas that spark innovation, and a nexus of risk and reward, where start-ups thrive.
Synbiotics is a perfect example of how this synergy works to Missouri's advantage. Synbiotics is a global leader in animal health. A couple of years ago, its president and CEO, Paul Hays, decided to move the corporate headquarters and research labs from San Diego to Kansas City.
Paul says there are five reasons why he brought his business to Missouri:
First, the opportunities for synergy and collaboration with other companies and scientists in Missouri's booming animal health corridor.
Second, proximity to his customers.
Third, financial incentives from Missouri, Platte County and Kansas City.
Fourth, Missouri's outstanding work ethic; and
Last, but not least, Paul's a Mizzou grad, class of '83.
All I can add to that is welcome back, and Go Tigers!
MOSIRA will help recruit more dynamic, science and technology companies like Synbiotics to Missouri. That's exactly what we want to do.
That brings me to the third part of my 2010 Jobs Plan. It focuses on Missouri's greatest asset: our people.
"Training for Tomorrow" is a new initiative to train more Missourians for jobs in growing fields, like lab techs, nursing aides, surveyors and mechanics. It gives community colleges the flexibility to enlarge training programs where there's high demand, and ensures there are enough workers to meet that demand.
In addition, I've proposed a 20 percent increase in funding for customized training programs tailored to the needs of specific high-tech industries. By matching industry's needs with training programs, more Missourians will be able to find work quickly.
Much of this training will take place at Missouri's excellent community colleges. There's no place where the link between education and employment is stronger.
I was at Crowder College in Neosho not long ago. President Alan Marble told me that if someone is out of work, they should go to the Dean's office today. They can sign up for a career training program - in alternative energy, health care, or drafting and design - and if they're willing to give it their all, he'll help find them a job.
Tonight, I call on you to show that same can-do spirit. Let's roll up our sleeves and pass this 2010 Jobs Plan.
There's another group of Missourians eager for work, who have real-world job experience and first-rate training from Uncle Sam. I'm talking about our veterans.
When I was in Iraq and Afghanistan last summer, the troops invariably asked me two questions: "How is Pujols doing?" and "Will there be a job for me when I get home?"
Tonight, I'm proud to announce the creation of "Show-Me Heroes," our new jobs initiative just for our veterans. The leader of this effort is Lieutenant Colonel Alan Rohlfing of the Missouri Army National Guard.
He'll be calling on employers all over the state, telling them about our disciplined, dedicated, hard-working veterans. When a job comes open, I want a veteran's resume on the top of the stack, so they get first crack at an interview.
I'm asking every employer in this state to step up and show that Missouri hires its veterans.
For veterans who are ready to retire, Missouri's also the first place to look, because we're going to continue to phase out the state income tax on military pensions until it's zero dollars.
Veterans are not the only ones who can get tax relief in Missouri this year. We're also helping homebuyers.
We're putting $15 million into an effort to give the housing industry a boost and help more Missourians afford the American Dream.
If you want to buy a house in 2010, the state will pick up your property taxes for the first year, for up to $1,250. And we're offering another $500 in tax relief if you make that house more energy efficient.
This will help put thousands of Missouri families in new homes, jumpstart the housing market and give our skilled tradesmen more green jobs.
In this tough economy, we've also got to protect vulnerable Missourians from a voracious predator: payday loan companies.
Hard times are like fertilizer for payday lenders; they just pop up overnight, like mushrooms.
For folks caught in a bad situation - maybe they lost their job, or the car broke down - payday loans may seem like the best option. But Missouri families shouldn't get fleeced.
According to the most recent data, the average payday loan in Missouri was $290 - at 430 percent interest.
And even at those exorbitant rates, you know how many loans were reported? Close to three million.
Missouri laws aren't tough enough to protect folks caught in this downward spiral of debt. We need to stand up for them, and pass meaningful payday loan reform this year.
By any measure, 2009 was a rough year.
In one way or another, the downturn hit everybody's pocketbook.
Missouri unemployment ran under the national average, but was still too high. A lot of friends and neighbors were out of work. Too many Missourians lost their homes, farms and businesses. Folks who hung onto their jobs saw their wages and benefits whittled away.
The impact of those economic blows knocked the wind out of state government. Revenue fell a staggering $778 million short of projections - the biggest one-year drop in Missouri history.
So state government did what every Missouri family had to do: tighten our belts, stretch every dollar and rein in spending.
We didn't bellyache about it; we just did it. We focused on our priorities, worked together, and made some real progress.
Unlike 29 other states, we balanced the budget without raising taxes.
How did Missouri do it?
We made state government leaner. In one year, I will have reduced the state workforce by nearly 1,800 positions.
We used technology to make government more efficient and effective.
We cut costs by renegotiating contracts.
I ordered state department heads to conserve energy, and we reduced our utility bill by six percent. I had to cut $600 million out of the state budget, but did so without losing sight of priorities like education and public safety.
And in terms of efficiencies, we're not finished yet.
For years, state government has been creating boards and commissions for this centennial or that special interest. Some do good work, while others don't do much of anything. Nobody paid much attention to them, and they just kept growing and growing until they turned into bureaucratic kudzu.
In an effort to root out government waste and inefficiency, I have already eliminated 13 of these boards and 227 positions.
And I call on the legislature to haul out the brush hog, and get rid of 18 more boards and 246 more positions.
Working together, we've been able to avoid the meltdowns we're now seeing in other states:
Massachusetts and Nevada jacked up their sales tax.
Arizona's on the verge of closing two-thirds of its state parks and selling its House and Senate buildings.
Nevada's Governor has proposed cutting K-12 funding by $700 million.
That's not going to happen here in Missouri.
Our early action and sound management have helped Missouri keep its spotless Triple-A credit rating. That saves taxpayers millions in interest each year. And it signals investors that Missouri is where smart money goes to grow. Moody's Investors Services, one of the nation's premier financial ratings firms, rated Missouri one of the top states to lead the nation's recovery.
By balancing the budget without raising taxes, making hard choices, and managing debt, Missouri is in a strong position to accelerate out of this downturn.
We could never have accomplished that without steadfast bipartisanship. I want to thank all of you for standing together last year and putting Missouri first.
We must summon that same bipartisan spirit for the hard work that lies ahead.
This year, although we're in better shape than other states, we still face sobering fiscal challenges. Revenue projections for fiscal 2011 are austere; we'll have less revenue than we did in 2009. It will take the patience and good faith of every person in this General Assembly - all 163 members of the House and all 34 members of the Senate - working as a team, to manage our limited resources and move Missouri forward on the path to prosperity.
While we are taking steps to get immediate economic returns, we also need to be making strategic investments to secure Missouri's long-term economic growth:
Investments in our children's education;
In health care;
In communities that are safe and vibrant;
And in the beauty and bounty of our state.
In our rapidly changing world, the education of Missouri's children is a high-stakes enterprise. Missouri can't succeed unless our schools succeed. And wherever students excel, we have dedicated teachers to thank.
All across the state, our public schools are stronger for the commendable work teachers do. And I'm not just talking about the work that goes on in classrooms from the first bell on Monday morning to the last bell on Friday afternoon.
I'm talking about the extra hours teachers put in before class, giving students extra help with math or English. And the weekends teachers devote to AP prep and band competitions. For these exceptional people, teaching isn't a job - it's a calling.
Criticizing public education is easy - and cheap. Educating children is hard - and takes serious investment. It's not enough to tell our teachers how much we value them; we must show them. And that is why my budget this year includes continued funding for Career Ladder. Our teachers have earned it.
Last year, we provided record funding for K-12 classrooms, even in the face of severe economic challenges. Other states, like Kansas and Georgia, are restricting education funds already appropriated.
Let me be clear: Every penny appropriated by the legislature last year will go to our K-12 classrooms this year.
Our budget challenges next year are no less daunting. Until the revenue picture changes, most folks in government understand that getting the job done with fewer resources is a given.
But budgets are about protecting priorities. And as we discussed my budget, and where and how much to cut, I took one thing off the table: K-12 classrooms. Our children are precious; their education is too important. So even in these difficult times, I am recommending increased funding, at a record level, for our K-12 classrooms.
Our commitment to education must extend beyond high school. But for too long, steep tuition hikes have put college out of reach for many Missouri families. Tom and Sandy Ray, who live in St. Louis, had three kids in college at the same time. That's a big price tag for a working family, but Tom and Sandy understood the value of a college degree and were willing to make the sacrifice.
When their family budget suffered a blow last year, they wondered how they'd manage to pay all three tuition bills. But last year, we froze tuition at all two- and four-year public colleges and universities in the state. For thousands of families like the Rays, that was a godsend.
Please welcome these two terrific Missouri parents, Tom and Sandy Ray.
But we're not done. I call on you to join me - and lead the nation by example - in supporting another tuition freeze this year. That would mean Missouri students and their families won't have to pay a penny more in tuition and fees two years in a row.
I want to bring college within reach for even more Missouri students, by addressing a blatant inequity in Missouri's A+ scholarship program. That program pays two years of community college tuition for high school kids who keep up their grades, give back, and stay out of trouble.
Today, a third of the kids in Missouri's public high schools can't even apply for these scholarships. That's because their schools aren't "officially designated" as A+ schools.
And that's just not fair.
A+ scholarships should be open to every hard-working public high school student in Missouri. And I count on your support to make that happen this year.
Our children are growing up in a high-speed, digital world; just watch them texting their friends. Without access to the fast lane on the information superhighway, we'll simply be a dusty detour.
This year, Missouri is competing to bring high-speed Internet to every part of our state, from the urban core to the last mile of gravel road.
For a small business like Strawberry's Bar-B-Que in Holcomb, that means instant access to customers from Jamaica to Japan. A college student could take courses on her laptop in Fair Play. A cancer specialist in St. Louis can read medical records from a family doctor in St. James.
We will compete for every possible dollar to turn this broadband project into reality and help Missouri stay competitive.
There's an undeniable correlation between a state's competitiveness and the cost of health care.
Last year, Missouri was poised to make real progress on health care. The Missouri Senate voted overwhelmingly to support my plan to provide health care to 35,000 working Missourians at no additional cost to state taxpayers. Unfortunately, that proposal failed on the last day of the session.
This year, there's been a lot of talk about health care, from the halls of Congress to town hall meetings across the country.
Congress is debating significant health care legislation. If that federal legislation passes, it's our job to show steady, bipartisan leadership and maximize the benefits for the people of Missouri.
There's another important health care issue that demands our immediate attention: autism. This spectrum of disorders is diagnosed in one in 110 children. And the sooner it is diagnosed and treated, the better their lives will be.
Myles and Lora Hinkel have a 7-year-old son, Blake, who has autism. Myles and Lora have been outstanding advocates not just for their son, but for all children with autism. Please welcome the Hinkels tonight.
Blake's father tells a moving story about hearing his son speak his first word at the age of three. Reaching that milestone took months of intensive therapy at the Thompson Center for Autism in Columbia. It was an enormous victory for Blake, summed up rather nicely in that first word: "MINE".
When the Hinkels' insurance company refused to pay for Blake's therapy, they willingly took the hit.
Because they know there is a critical period of time to turn on the light in the developing brain of a child with autism. And if that critical time passes, the light goes out.
Children with autism shouldn't have to wait for their parents to come up with the cash, or for insurance companies to grow a conscience.
They need our help now.
For months, I have stood with Democratic and Republican legislators on this issue, and laid out the key elements of a bill that we all know will make a real difference in these children's lives.
This is the year we stand up to insurance companies.
This is the year we make them cover autism.
This is the year we turn on the light for thousands of children like Blake Hinkel.
There's another young man I'd like to tell you about. His name is Travis, and he's up in the balcony tonight with his family. When Travis was 8, both his legs were crushed in a car accident caused by a drunk driver. Travis and his mom, Karen, almost died from their injuries. They told me they feel lucky to be alive.
Travis is 11 now; he's had five operations on his legs so far, and he'll need three more. But he's making steady progress. Please welcome this brave young man and his family.
The man behind the wheel of the car that hit Travis and his family had a prior conviction for drunk driving. But there he was - drunk again - coming at them the wrong way on an exit ramp. Travis and his family paid a terrible price for that man's terrible crime.
And that's why I have proposed legislation to effectively prosecute and punish drunk drivers and - most important - yank their licenses, and get them off the road before they shatter more lives. I urge you to send that bill to my desk this year.
Any long-term strategy for improving Missouri's economy, and enhancing our quality of life, must take full advantage of our natural heritage: our woodlands and our streams, our caves and our canyons, our plains and our prairies.
Hunting, fishing, hiking and camping are part of our Missouri way of life. When I was a kid, I did a lot of fishing with my dad. We'd get up early, toss our gear in the back of the station wagon and head down to Bennett Spring or Montauk. I'd be hip-deep in cold water before the mist had rolled off the river.
I spent many golden hours learning to read the river, learning to tie flies that could fool a trout. That kindled my love of the outdoors, which I passed along to my sons - and I hope they'll pass along to theirs.
We need to get more kids off the couch, away from their videogames and back outdoors, because there are some lessons that only Nature can teach.
Tonight, I am pleased to announce the creation of the Missouri State Parks Youth Corps. We'll put more than a thousand young people to work this summer at our 85 state parks and historic sites.
Our park system is a legacy passed on to us by Missourians of extraordinary vision and generosity. Missourians like Edmund Babler, Peter Bennett and Leo Drey; Annie Van Meter, and Ted and Pat Jones. Even in these lean times, we have a responsibility to be good stewards of these treasures, and preserve them for future generations.
My Parks Youth Corps will learn to be good stewards of the land from the ground up: picking up trash, cutting brush, and building trails.
They'll also be outdoor ambassadors in my effort to reverse a 10-year decline in the number of visitors to our beautiful, affordable state parks. More visitors will also pump more money into our tourism industry.
For families who love the outdoors, there's just no better deal around. Now we've got to spread the word: If you like to kayak or fish, bird-watch or mountain bike, come to Missouri first.
Missouri's land has always been the foundation of our economy. Our farmers have fed the nation, and they can feed a hungry world. In a global marketplace, the demand for Missouri agricultural products is primed to expand exponentially.
We've got to sell globally, and buy locally.
This year, we'll sell a record amount of corn and soybeans to Taiwan. That's good for our trade balance and good for our farmers.
Here at home, every Missouri family should be able to share the bounty of the land, including fresh, healthy produce. That's why my budget will help promote local farmers markets, and encourage more folks to start community gardens in their neighborhoods.
I've focused this evening on our shared obligations: creating jobs, managing the budget and holding down taxes. I've talked about working together to make our communities safer, stronger and healthier. I've talked about making strategic, long-term investments in Missouri's future.
But we have one more piece of unfinished business: Ethics.
It's time we gave the people of Missouri a state government that's as honest and straight-shooting as they are.
Last year, we demolished the patronage system long-used for awarding license fee offices. We created a more efficient system with a transparent bidding process. And it will produce revenue we can put to good use.
Two years ago, the legislature passed a bill to pay for college for the families of veterans killed or seriously disabled in combat. Just one problem: no funding.
Last year, the legislature passed a bill to pay a survivors' benefit to the families of firefighters, police officers, state troopers and sheriff's deputies killed in the line of duty. Same problem: no funding.
With the $800,000 our new fee office system will produce, we can finally do right by these heroes and their families, and fund both of these programs this year.
Good government really does pay dividends.
And we can do more. We can pass meaningful ethics reform this year.
There are a number of good reform proposals out there. But to my mind, meaningful ethics reform must do four basic things:
Stop the sneaky, back-door donations from committee-to-committee.
Ban one officeholder from working as a political consultant for another officeholder.
Shut the revolving door between the legislature and lobbyists, for good.
And most importantly, set strict limits on campaign contributions. Missouri voters overwhelmingly mandated them. As Attorney General, I fought for them. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld them.
It's the right thing to do.
In the last year, I've logged thousands of miles traveling our great state. I've had coffee with small business owners on Main Street, and chewed the fat with cattlemen. I've visited with combat veterans and college kids, schoolteachers and scientists.
I've met hard-working families struggling to pay their bills, and laid-off factory workers with no health insurance.
A lot of folks are worried about their jobs. About how they're going to pay the mortgage and medical bills. They're anxious about retirement, and what, if anything, will be left for their kids and grandkids.
But not once - not one single time - did I hear anyone say: "Poor me."
Not once did anyone tell me, "Governor, I give up."
Times may be tough.
But Missourians are tougher.
Remember the lesson of the ice storm: Our greatest strength lies in one another.
If we can hang tough a little longer, work together and stay on the path, we're going to keep climbing... and climbing... and climbing ...until we see the bright horizon.
Because Missouri's future is bright.
Even now, there are glimmers of recovery. Some parts of our economy - like health care and technology - are starting to hire again.
Home sales and industrial production are beginning to tick upward. Consumers are cautiously starting to spend.
These first warm rays of recovery are a sign that our discipline and hard work of the past year are paying off for the people of Missouri.
And at the end of the day, whether we vote red, blue or purple, most of us want the same things.
A state that's competitive and prosperous.
A state where hard-working people can find a decent job, buy a house and raise a family.
A state brimming with opportunity, so our children can sink roots and raise families of their own.
A state where health care is abundant and affordable.
A state where every child gets a first-rate education.
A state whose natural beauty beckons us to hike and bike, hunt and fish.
And a state where neighbors help neighbors.
Do we have hard work ahead of us? Yes, we do.
Will we make progress this year? Yes, we will.
Can we move faster if we work together? Absolutely.
Tonight, let's swear an oath, to the people of the state we love and to each other - that nothing will stand in the way of rebuilding our economy and reimagining our future.
Let's make 2010 the year we put politics second, and put Missouri first.
Thank you.
And God bless Missouri.
Public opinion leans toward smaller government
The trend of public opinion on the size of government ebbs and flows, and right now we're headed back toward a flood of support for smaller government.
The survey taken Jan. 15 estimates that 58 percent of Americans currently favor smaller government. The current trend is likely, in part, a function of the tea party movement and a response to intense scrutiny of the federal health care reform proposals. When President Barack Obama took office on year ago, that number was just 53 percent.
Surprisingly, the trough in this trend and desire to grow government was actually higher during the Republican administration of George W. Bush. At that time, the country was split and support for small government reached the lowest levels since the Post began collecting data on the topic.
What does this mean in Missouri? Probably not much. Missouri politics has always been on the forefront of small government. That's precisely why wages for state workers are anemic and why Democrats and Republicans alike often propose major cuts to government programs. But if the trend has swung nationally, it's likely the desire for small government in Missouri is all that much stronger as well.
As lawmakers work to develop the state budget for the next fiscal year in coming months, and Gov. Jay Nixon outlines his priorities in the State of the State tonight, the public desire to root out inefficiency and restrain government growth is something to bear in mind now more than during the last 8 years.
The most recent Washington Post poll surveyed 1,023 adults using cellular and land line telephones and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
Related Links:
Washington Post Poll Data
Missouri lawmakers oppose federal healthcare reforms in resolution
As Massachusetts voters cast their final votes to elect a Republican Senator last night, ending the Democratic super majority in the U.S. Senate, the fate of health care reforms officially became uncertain. Nonetheless, lawmakers in the Missouri House voted Tuesday evening to pass a resolution urging the state's Congressional delegation to oppose efforts in Washington D.C. to modify federal health care.
The resolution, HCR 18, was sponsored by State Rep. John Diehl (R). With a final vote of 111-46, the resolution passed with support from a number of Democrats.
The resolution that went to the floor on Tuesday, later amended on the House floor, decries the manner in which final negotiations on the legislation have been handled in Washington, opposes that federal funds could support abortion, and that unfunded mandates place an undue burden on Missourians.
"This bill is too big, it's too expensive, it's too dense, it's too corrupt and hands out too many special deals," Diehl, the resolution's sponsor, said.
Estimates of the federal legislation to the state range from $15 million to $300 million annually.
House Democratic leader Paul Levota called the resolution "political theater."
In the end though, while all Republicans supported the measure, Democrats were split. 46 Democrats opposed the resolution, 24 supported, 1 voted present and another was absent. 11 of the Democrats opposing won't be up for re-election since their term-limited after this year, and another 29 are in Districts rated by MPN as safe, which means it's unlikely Republicans could use the vote against them successfully in the 2010 campaigns.
The resolution is non-binding and does not force action for any of Missouri's elected officials serving in Washington.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
MPN 2010 Missouri House Race Ratings
As of the end of 2009, MPN projects Republicans will hold 84 districts and Democrats will keep 69, with 10 districts rated as toss-ups. Even if Democrats won all 10 toss-up districts, since they currently hold 5 of them, it wouldn't be enough to take back control of the House. That's the grim story.
The only hope for a take back by Democrats is to continue recruiting strong candidates in the "lean" districts. In fact, that's exactly why we're labeling District 121 a toss-up. Democrats recruited Courtney Cole to challenge first-term State Rep. Denny Hoskins (R), who recently came under fire for failing to pay $20,000 in back taxes for a family-owned business. Cole has not only mastered the use of social media to fundraise and communicate with district voters, but has strong support from the Central Missouri State campus community in this historically Republican district that includes Whiteman Air Force Base.
Since MPN's projections are based on the state of the world at the end of 2009, a number of factors that the ratings rely on can, and probably will, still change. For instance if stronger candidates are recruited for some districts, if certain candidates prove to be particularly adept fundraisers, or if the national political landscape fundamentally changes, our ratings will be off the mark and could swing in favor of either party.
The races that are most likely to be impacted by this uncertainty are the toss-ups and the 57 districts that currently "lean" toward one party. The "lean" districts are those in which upsets are still possible, but the trends support favoring one party over the other.
Below is our interactive map [interactive features deactivated] followed by short summaries for each district. Note that the toss-up districts are not ranked, at least not yet:
House District 6: Republicans have been looking for a chance to gain control of this district for more than two decades. Since Rep. Rachel Bringer is term-limited, 2010 might just be their chance. MPN’s Missouri Voting Index shows all four counties that make up this district are trending in favor of Republicans, more so in 2008 than 2004. So far though, no Republican has filed a campaign finance committee in the district. We’ve labeled this a toss-up largely because it’s unlikely Republicans will let this opportunity slip by.
House District 17: In 2008, Rep. Kenny Biermann defeated three-term incumbent Rep. Vicki Schneider (R) by just 73 votes. In this swing district, close elections are the norm. Schneider won her first term in 2002 by 65 votes. This year, the stage is set for a re-match that could allow Schneider to return for her fourth and final term in the third contest between the two. So far, Biermann has raised $6,000 more than Schneider, but if Democrats are serious about attempts to re-take the House, this is a district they will need to hold on to.
House District 24: In 2008, Rep. Chris Kelly unseated former Rep. Ed Robb (R) in a costly election decided by a full 1.6 percentage points. Kelly, who was first elected to the House in 1982, won’t be term-limited until 2016. But that doesn’t mean he will not be vulnerable in 2010 if Republicans decide to target the seat. District 24 is a swing district by anyone’s definition and if the anti-Democratic mood continues down ballot to House races, as expected, Kelly could become a targeted race. Again, this race may be prematurely called a toss-up since no Republican challengers have filed committees yet with the Missouri Ethics Commission. But that doesn’t mean a strong challenger won’t appear in coming weeks. And anyone challenging Kelly will have to be a strong fundraiser, because at the end of 2009 he had $44,000 in the bank. We’ll be keeping our eyes on this one just in case Robb reappears as a challenger.
House District 30: This district is surrounded by both a collection of safe and favored districts for both parties in MPN’s current ratings, making its status as a toss-up all that much more interesting. Rep. Jason Brown (R) is term-limited, so the fact that this seat is wide open could give Democrats a good opportunity for a pickup of a seat held by Democrats before Brown unseated the incumbent in 2002. Currently, just one Democrat, attorney Lexi Norris, is in the race while Republicans are headed into a primary between Nickolas Marshall and Sherri Plunkett. Neither Republican has done all that well fundraising, leaving Norris with a significant lead over the combined total of Republican dollars in the race.
House District 54: Democrats have shown they are serious about winning this historically Republican district that covers suburban Blue Springs. With Rep. Gary Dusenberg (R) term-limited this year, Democratic candidate John Bullard is already off to a strong fundraising track, and currently has about seven times the cash-on-hand as the lone Republican challenger, Jeanie Lauer.
House District 55: Democrats have an early start in this historically Republican district with candidate Clay Rodgers already coming out strong in fundraising and with union support. A Republican will no doubt appear to challenge Rodgers, but that’s to be seen. Given the early Democratic advantage in fundraising along with shifting demographics, this open district could swing to Democrats in 2010.
House District 110: We’re labeling this open district a toss-up, even though it’s really too soon to tell what will happen. The lone Republican in the race recently bowed out, perhaps to pave the way for a stronger Republican who will face one of the three Democrats currently heading into the party primary later this year. Because of the three-way primary, a Republican entering will have the advantage of facing a likely tattered opponent in the general election. Although Democrats have held this seat for the last decade and Republicans didn’t even field a candidate against term-limited Democratic Rep. Belinda Harris, the district that includes portions of Jefferson and Washington counties still maintains a strong Republican base. We’ll be watching this contest closely to see who Republicans recruit.
House District 120: First term Rep. Scott Largent, a former county coroner, won this district in 2008 by a 2 point margin, far below the historical margin for Republicans in this area. This reduction signifies shifting demographics and ideologies likely to play a significant role in the 2010 elections. The district, which includes Henry County, heavily supported Democrats US Rep. Ike Skelton, Gov. Jay Nixon, Secretary of State Robin Carnahan, and Attorney General Chris Koster in 2008. The youthful Democratic challenger Zac Maggi, an attorney in Clinton, is sure to make Largent’s re-election a tough win for Republicans if he manages to level the playing field by raising money at the same rate as Largent.
House District 121: This district in the heart of moderate Missouri includes both the University of Central Missouri and Whiteman Air Force Base. Incumbent Republican Denny Hoskins, who won in 2008 by less than a percentage point, recently became embroiled in a scandal related to failure to pay $20,000 in back taxes for a family-owned business. Democratic challenger Courtney Cole has proven she will be a formidable opponent and will definitely make re-election difficult for Hoskins in a district once held by Democrats that has been held by Republicans since 2002. The contest will likely be one of the most closely watched statehouse races in the 2010 election cycle.
House District 152: Popular Democratic Rep. JC Kuessner is term-limited after the current session leaving this seat open. The same seat was once held by legendary Rep. Wayne Crump (D) who sponsored major legislation addressing Sunday liquor sales, sexual intercourse with minors, conservation, and disability rights. MPN’s Missouri Voting Index shows counties included in this district showed a shift toward Democrats in statewide elections between 2004 and 2008. But it’s not clear that trend was more than a one-time anomaly. Some Democrats seem confident this seat will be held regardless, but with two Democrats vying for the seat and both showing poor fundraising to date, unless one bows out there will be a primary. The Republican challenger, however, currently has no opposition and a stronger track record for fundraising.























